Moving research into practice: summary report of the Ex/Cancer meeting on physical activity, exercise, and rehabilitation in oncology

Meeting Report


Moving research into practice: summary report of the Ex/Cancer meeting on physical activity, exercise, and rehabilitation in oncology


D. Santa Mina, PhD*,, A.J. Fong, PhD§, A.R. Petrella, MA*, S.N. Culos-Reed, PhD||,#**, M. Chasen, MBChB, MPhil(Pall Med)††, C.M. Sabiston, PhD*



doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4120


ABSTRACT

The development of evidence-based exercise guidelines for people with cancer represents a major achievement in research and provides direction to programming initiatives. The prevalence of sedentary cancer survivors and the risk posed by inactivity suggests a knowledge-to-action gap for which the evidence has not led to increased exercise levels in that population. To address that gap, researchers continue to explore opportunities to improve the understanding of exercise within the oncologic context—from tumour biology to behaviour-change theories—to drive improved access and participation in exercise and rehabilitative activity. In Canada, such efforts have largely been invested by individuals and small teams across the country rather than by unifying stakeholders to drive nationwide impact. Accordingly, a national group of leading researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders convened a meeting to discuss and strategize initiatives on how to conduct innovative research into the effects of exercise and rehabilitation in cancer survivors, to increase access to exercise and rehabilitation services in cancer survivors, and to reduce sedentary behaviour in cancer survivors. The 2-day meeting, titled Ex/Cancer, was held April 2017 in Toronto, Ontario, and was attended by 83 stakeholders from across Canada, representing knowledge end-users (cancer survivors), clinicians (oncologists, nurses, counsellors), a provincial cancer care agency, community-based exercise and cancer organizations, and researchers. Attendees participated in networking events, roundtable discussions, and breakout sessions to identify, discuss, and develop clinical and research experiences and opportunities. In addition to knowledge exchange between attendees, the meeting set the foundation for the development of a collaborative network to support the development, dissemination, and support of clinical and research activity in exercise and rehabilitation for cancer survivors. With unanimous support from attendees, a major product of the Ex/Cancer meeting was the formation of the Canadian Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise Network—coren.

KEYWORDS: Exercise, rehabilitation, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, knowledge translation

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a chronic disease that has surpassed cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in Canadians1. An estimated 60% of all Canadian cancer survivors will live disease-free for more than 5 years after diagnosis1. As survival rates continue to rise, attention has shifted to include short- and long-term survivorship issues. Physical and psychological health issues associated with the diagnosis and treatment of cancer have been well documented and include, but are not limited to, fatigue, pain, fear of recurrence, depression, and local or systemic impairments2,3. Cancer treatment–related adverse effects and their lingering nature throughout survivorship warrant strategies to prevent or minimize such burdensome outcomes4.

Physical activity, exercise, and rehabilitation are safe, feasible, and effective nonpharmacologic strategies that improve health and quality of life from cancer diagnosis to end of life58. Recent research has also demonstrated numerous antineoplastic properties of exercise that might prolong survival4,9. In contrast, sedentary behaviour has been independently associated with the progression of some cancers and poorer overall quality of life1012. Collectively, the evidence has contributed to endorsements, guidelines, and frameworks for exercise in oncology that support targets of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise plus 2–3 days per week of resistance training of the major muscle groups for cancer survivors13—consistent with public recommendations for adult Canadians14. Despite the development of exercise guidelines and mounting evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of exercise, a knowledge-to-action gap is apparent: Cancer survivors, in great proportion, are not meeting physical activity targets, and they spend approximately 70% of their waking hours sedentary12,15,16. Furthermore, tailored physical activity, exercise, or rehabilitation programming is not widely accessible to significantly enable and engage survivors in achieving routine physical activity17.

Gaps in knowledge translation (kt) are in part attributable to a lack of public health strategies for increasing physical activity in cancer survivors because of a predominant focus on scientific discovery (for example, accumulation of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews focused on exercise trials in cancer); limited designs for studies with “real world” relevance and effectiveness; and inadequate collaboration and coordination between researchers and stakeholders such as cancer survivors, cancer care clinicians, public health policymakers, and patient advocacy groups17. The absence of a cohesive national initiative from a breadth of experts and stakeholders could be limiting the advancement of research into practice. Efforts to advance the science and to change practice and policy in Canada stand to gain from the collective expertise and experience emerging across the country. Using strategies such as knowledge exchange, unified strategic planning, and resource sharing, the collective efforts of stakeholders in cancer and exercise might achieve greater impetus toward improved dissemination and implementation of useful and sustainable exercise oncology supportive care.

Building on a previous kt event that publicly launched Exercise Guidelines for People with Cancer18 and aiming to enable the proverbial “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts,” we sought to facilitate collaboration and mutual support by convening a 2-day meeting for exercise and cancer survivorship kt and exchange. The meeting, called Ex/Cancer, was held in Toronto, Ontario, 6–7 April 2017, and was hosted by the University of Toronto and the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. The primary objectives of Ex/Cancer were to present and discuss innovations in exercise and rehabilitation science for cancer survivors, cancer exercise and rehabilitation program accessibility and program development, and strategies to reduce sedentary behaviour in cancer survivors. Those objectives underscored the fundamental aim of creating cohesion and collaboration between Canadian researchers, clinicians, and stakeholders to advance exercise and rehabilitation care for cancer survivors. The meeting was held in conjunction with a public symposium aimed at disseminating knowledge about exercise and cancer.

EVENT SUMMARY

Ex/Cancer hosted 83 stakeholders from 5 provinces representing eastern (Newfoundland), central (Ontario, Quebec), and western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta). Attendees included survivors (defined as an individual from the point of cancer diagnosis onward)19, oncology care providers (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists), exercise professionals (for example, registered kinesiologists, exercise physiologists), community partners (program administrators and leaders), researchers, fundraisers, private industry, policymakers, trainees, and students. Table I describes the sessions and the speakers; the meeting was co-chaired by authors DSM and CMS.

TABLE I Session highlights from the Ex/Cancer national meeting


 

Day 1: KT and Care Provider Training

The first day (6 April 2017) focused on models of exercise programming and the promotion of access to, and awareness of, the Exercise Guidelines for People with Cancer13. Presentations described a variety of national and regional initiatives to support guideline implementation, including facilitated discussions aimed at highlighting current kt and knowledge exchange strategies, and facilitators and barriers experienced by program providers in university, hospital, and community settings. A member from Cancer Care Ontario (the regional cancer care authority) described that organization’s process for developing patient and clinician resources to support the dissemination strategy, including patient and family information pamphlets and an exercise log; informational posters for clinic areas, with exercise tips and facts; social media posts; and the development of a referral pathway for oncologists and nurses to use. Those approaches were contextualized in presentations describing a general lack of awareness among oncology health care providers about the exercise guidelines20 and limited or absent exercise information for cancer survivors on cancer centre Web sites21,22 or in clinics.

In addition to resources directly connected to programming initiatives, 3 online platforms designed to increase physical activity and to reduce sedentary behaviour among cancer survivors were presented. Active-Match23 is a resource that uses technology comparable to that for online dating to help women diagnosed with cancer find their close-to-ideal exercise partners. Within the ActiveMatch system (http://www.activematch.ca), exercise partners can receive exercise counselling and information about community events for partnerbased exercise. The second program described was Project move24—a combination of “micro-grants” and financial incentives that help women diagnosed with breast cancer to develop their own exercise programs or initiatives in western Canada. Finally, the Truenth Lifestyle Management platform for men with prostate cancer was highlighted (https://lifestyle.truenth.ca/). It includes a 12-week home-based program with remote support from a qualified exercise professional; educational resources related to exercise, diet, and stress management available online or in community-based group programs; and programmatic manuals for community-based organizations that would like to start a facility-based exercise program for men with prostate cancer.

An essential element to successful kt of lifestyle interventions in the clinical setting is engagement by the health care provider team. Noted challenges to exercise promotion and support in oncology include lack of awareness of the benefits and safety of exercise after a cancer diagnosis, perceived lack of competence in discussing exercise with patients, and lack of time for exercise promotion during clinical interactions20. Strategies to address those barriers were presented and focused on cancer-exercise education and training opportunities for exercise professionals and physicians. Thrive Health Services (http://thrivehealthservices.com/) and Wellspring described training programs targeted at exercise and rehabilitation professionals to advance their understanding of cancer as it pertains to physical activity and exercise. Additionally, advances in medical school curricula aimed at counselling and addressing physical activity and nutrition behaviours were described as further opportunities for improved awareness and engagement in exercise promotion for patients by oncologists. Specifically, physician training related to exercise was suggested to support competence and involvement in discussing exercise with patients (including providing generalized exercise guidance and behaviour counselling), assessing patients for medical clearance to exercise, and offering appropriate referrals to qualified exercise professionals.

A public symposium given during the evening of day 1 at the University of Toronto attracted more than 300 attendees, including community partners (16%), health care specialists (13%), patients (8.3%), media representatives (1.3%), and members of the public (61.4%). The public symposium can be accessed at https://vimeo.com/212588663.

Day 2: Collaborating for Innovation in Exercise and Cancer Research

The morning of day 2 of Ex/Cancer included a closed meeting to discuss progress related to a specific project by attending co-investigators. Concurrent to the closed meeting, a breakout group consisting of 10 research trainees and graduate students was tasked with envisioning the future of exercise and cancer from their perspective, including research directions, training for health professionals, programming design, and facilitation of the system-level changes needed to accommodate exercise in usual cancer care.

Participants in the breakout group identified three key areas in which to advance the field of exercise and cancer. First, improving education and training related to exercise and cancer for exercise and health professionals was considered essential, including offering early exposure to concepts of exercise and cancer at the undergraduate level, increasing placement or practicum opportunities throughout the undergraduate and graduate years, and promoting existing cancer and exercise training and certification. The second area involved improving the accessibility of exercise and rehabilitation programming with mechanisms that support or formally embed any or all of discussion, education, and referrals into standard cancer care. Triage models that assign patients to hospital- or community-based programs according to medical complexity were discussed as opportunities to make efficient use of resources. To complement that integration into the oncology standard of care, systematic data collection about exercise (including prescription parameters) or sedentary behaviours (or both) was suggested as a potential method to identify patients in need of education or assistance to be able to incorporate exercise into self-management strategies. Third, common barriers to successful research trials were discussed, including recruitment, the research environment (for example, finding appropriate “real world” settings) and selecting the ideal measures to capture essential patient-reported outcomes without overburdening participants. Table I summarizes key developments from those discussions.

The Ex/Cancer meeting concluded with an afternoon session dedicated to facilitating collaboration between researchers across Canada in an effort to increase scientific and clinical impact. The principal investigator or delegate provided a brief summary of the laboratory focus. Each laboratory generously shared their current and planned trials in exercise and cancer to foster a collegial and collaborative relationship between peers from across Canada. Those presentations were followed by group discussions of key strategies for improving knowledge and resource-sharing that would help to achieve the bottom-line objective of increasing the exercise level of cancer survivors across Canada. With emphatic and unanimous endorsement from the attendees, it was agreed that a formal network of colleagues and stakeholders invested in exercise and rehabilitation in cancer would significantly advance the goal of sharing research, resources, and support.

ATTENDEE FEEDBACK

At the end of the meeting, attendees were asked to provide anonymous feedback about the event. Of the 78 in-person attendees, 23 offered responses to the feedback questionnaire (29.5% response rate). Using a 7-point Likert scale (from 1, not at all satisfied, to 7, very satisfied), attendees were satisfied with the meeting (6.6 ± 0.49), felt that the objectives were met (6.4 ± 0.72), and felt that the meeting was worthwhile (6.7 ± 0.47). Two open-ended questions asked attendees to describe what they liked most and to comment on the take-home points and outcomes of the meeting. In general, attendees enjoyed the generation of new ideas and the diversity of topics discussed. Overall, attendees believed that the take-home points of the meeting were related to collaborative and coordinated efforts by community members, health professionals, and researchers and an understanding of the referral pathways for exercise for survivors. Table II summarizes the coded responses.

TABLE II Summary of codes of open responses (2 items) from attendee feedback questionnaire

 

After the meeting, a survey was sent to the attendees to help decide on a name for a national network of stakeholders and parties interested in physical activity, exercise, and rehabilitation research and programming. The proposed name with a majority of favourable responses was the Canadian Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise Network—coren (http://www.oncrehabexercise.ca/).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise improves health-related fitness and overall quality of life, and can affect cancer outcomes in cancer survivors. The field of exercise oncology has grown rapidly since the late 1980s, with considerable attention from a growing group of stakeholders spanning multiple disciplines. One question at the forefront of the field is how to integrate, into usual care, comprehensive programming that focuses on increasing exercise and reducing sedentary behaviour. To advance such initiatives, Ex/Cancer aimed to bring together a group of key stakeholders connected to physical activity, exercise, rehabilitation, and cancer to discuss the current state and future development of related research and clinical care in Canada. Through kt activities that included presentations, discussions, and networking activities, several themes and action items emerged. Specifically, it was agreed that kt strategies will be advanced through exercise and rehabilitation programmatic development and evaluation, and by improved training related to cancer and exercise for qualified exercise professionals and health professionals. The most significant impact of the Ex/Cancer meeting was likely the emergence of a working collaborative for clinicians, researchers, and other stakeholders to address gaps in clinical research priorities. Looking forward, communication, collaboration, consistency, and cohesion are crucial in fostering and facilitating change in clinical oncology practice toward exercise and rehabilitation programs that are embedded in standard cancer care. The launch of coren is intended to support such initiatives.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful for the assistance of Kailey Trewartha, Darren Au, Efthymios Papadopoulos, Priya Brahmbhatt, Paty Lopez, Christian Lopez, Alyssa Franzese, Myann Marks, Jim Redding, and Dr. Jennifer Jones in Ex/Cancer planning and delivery. DSM and CMS also express sincere appreciation to the planning committee (Dr. Luc Tremblay, Marisol D’Andrea, and Sarah Baker) and the co-panelists (Dr. Roanne Segal, Claudia Hernandez, Gareth Wheeler) for the Ex/Cancer public symposium. Also acknowledged are the contributions of all the other participants involved in the meeting and coren endorsement: Danielle Barry-Hicket, Dr. Jennifer Brunet, Dr. Kristin Campbell, Dr. Cristina Caperchione, Dr. Lauren Capozzi, Dr. Eugene Chang, Dr. Kerry Courneya, Dr. Amy Deckert, Dr. Isabelle Dore, Dr. Christine Friedenreich, Dr. Lise Gauvin, Dr. Kristina Karvinen, Katelyn Kauffeldt, Mhairi Kubko, Dr. Melanie Keats, Dr. Meghan McDonough, Dr. Erin Mc-Gowan, Dr. Marina Mourtzakis, Dr. Michelle Nadler, Dr. Chris Perry, Caryl Russell, Gerilyn Sheppard, Kate Smith, Dr. Jennifer Tomasone, and Dr. Jeff Vallance. CMS holds a Canada Research Chair in physical activity and mental health. Funding for this kt event was provided in part by the Canadian Cancer Society (grant no. 316288), the University of Toronto, and the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare the following interests: SNCR is the co-founder of Thrive Health Services. The remaining authors have no conflicts to disclose.

AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS

*Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto,
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto,
Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto,
§School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON,
||Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary,
#Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary,
**Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB,
††Palliative Care, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON.

REFERENCES

1 Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2017. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2017.

2 Reich M, Lesur A, Perdrizet-Chevallier C. Depression, quality of life and breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;110:9–17.
cross-ref  

3 Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2008;27:32.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

4 Courneya KS. Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: are fitness and quality-of-life benefits enough to change practice? Curr Oncol 2017;24:8–9.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

5 Sabiston CM, Brunet J. Reviewing the benefits of physical activity during cancer survivorship. Am J Lifestyle Med 2012;6:167–77.
cross-ref  

6 Silver JK, Baima J, Mayer RS. Impairment driven cancer rehabilitation: an essential component of quality care and survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:295–317.
cross-ref  pubmed  

7 Bluethmann SM, Vernon SW, Gabriel KP, Murphy CC, Bartholomew LK. Taking the next step: a systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity and behavior change interventions in recent post-treatment breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;149:331–42.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

8 Speck RM, Courneya KS, Mâsse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH. An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv 2010;4:87–100. [Erratum in: J Cancer Surviv 2011;5:112]
cross-ref  pubmed  

9 Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Farris MS, Courneya KS. Physical activity and cancer outcomes: a precision medicine approach. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:4766–75.
cross-ref  pubmed  

10 Dallal CM, Brinton LA, Matthews CE, et al. Accelerometer-based measures of active and sedentary behavior in relation to breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;134:1279–90.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

11 Lynch BM, Dunstan DW, Vallance JK, Owen N. Don’t take cancer sitting down: a new survivorship research agenda. Cancer 2013;119:1928–35.
cross-ref  pubmed  

12 Lynch BM. Sedentary behavior and cancer: a systematic review of the literature and proposed biological mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:2691–709.
cross-ref  pubmed  

13 Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E, Tomasone JR, Loblaw A, Petrella T on behalf of the Exercise for People with Cancer Guideline Development Group. Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review. Curr Oncol 2017;24:e290–315.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

14 Canadian Society of Exercise Physiology (csep). Canadian Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines. Ottawa, ON: csep; 2012.

15 Sabiston CM, Brunet J, Vallance JK, Meterissian S. Prospective examination of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time after breast cancer treatment: sitting on the crest of the teachable moment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23:1324–30.
cross-ref  pubmed  

16 Sabiston CM, Lacombe J, Faulkner G, Jones J, Trinh L. Profiling sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: links with depression symptoms during the early survivorship period. Psychooncology 2018;27:569–75.
cross-ref  

17 Phillips SM, Alfano CM, Perna FM, Glasgow RE. Accelerating translation of physical activity and cancer survivorship research into practice: recommendations for a more integrated and collaborative approach. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers 2014;23:687–99.
cross-ref  

18 Tomasone JR, Zwaal C, Kim G, Yuen D, Sussman J, Segal R. Moving guidelines into action: a report from Cancer Care Ontario’s event Let’s Get Moving: Exercise and Rehabilitation for Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol 2017;24:e65–74.
cross-ref  

19 Mullan F. Seasons of survival: reflections of a physician with cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;313:270–3.
cross-ref  pubmed  

20 Nadler M, Bainbridge D, Tomasone J, Cheifetz O, Juergens RA, Sussman J. Oncology care provider perspectives on exercise promotion in people with cancer: an examination of knowledge, practices, barriers, and facilitators. Support Care Cancer 2017;25:2297–304.
cross-ref  pubmed  

21 Buote RD, Malone SD, Bélanger LJ, McGowan EL. Quality and accuracy of publicly accessible cancer related physical activity information on the Internet: a cross sectional assessment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016;25:795–805.
cross-ref  

22 Sylvester BD, Zammit K, Fong AJ, Sabiston CM. An evaluation of the behaviour-change techniques used on Canadian cancer centre Web sites to support physical activity behaviour for breast cancer survivors. Curr Oncol 2017;24:e477–85.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

23 Sabiston C, Amireault S, Tamminen K, Fong A, Jones J. Exercise “dating”: instigating preferred social support for exercise through a match-making website for women cancer survivors [abstract]. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2015:37(suppl 1):S142. [Available online at: http://naspspa.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/PDF-All-Abstracts-for-the-2015-Conference. pdf; cited 22 October 2018]

24 Caperchione CM, Sabiston CM, Clark MI, et al. Innovative approach for increasing physical activity among breast cancer survivors: protocol for Project move, a quasi-experimental study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012533.
cross-ref  


Correspondence to: Catherine Sabiston, 55 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2W6. E-mail: catherine.sabiston@utoronto.ca

(Return to Top)


Current Oncology, VOLUME 25, NUMBER 6, DECEMBER 2018








Copyright © 2019 Multimed Inc.
ISSN: 1198-0052 (Print) ISSN: 1718-7729 (Online)