Risk and predictors of suicide in colorectal cancer patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis

Original Article


Risk and predictors of suicide in colorectal cancer patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis


H.H. Samawi, MBChB*, A.A. Shaheen, MD MSc, P.A. Tang, MD*, D.Y.C. Heng, MD MPH*, W.Y. Cheung, MD MPH, M.M. Vickers, MD MPH§


doi: https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3713


ABSTRACT

Background

The risk of suicide is higher for patients with colorectal cancer (crc) than for the general population. Given known differences in morbidity and sites of recurrence, we sought to compare the predictors of suicide for patients with colon cancer and with rectal cancer.

Methods

Using the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, adult patients with confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum during 1973–2009 were identified. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to assess selected variables, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine predictors of suicide.

Results

The database identified 187,996 patients with rectal cancer and 443,368 with colon cancer. Compared with the rectal cancer group, the colon cancer group was older (median age: 70 years vs. 67 years; p < 0.001) and included more women (51% vs. 43%, p < 0.001). Suicide rates were similar in the colon and rectal cancer groups [611 (0.14%) vs. 337 (0.18%), p < 0.001]. On univariate analysis, rectal cancer was a predictor of suicide [hazard ratio (hr): 1.26; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.10 to 1.43]. However, after adjusting for clinical and pathology factors, rectal cancer was not a predictor of suicide (hr: 1.05; 95% ci: 0.83 to 1.33). In the colon cancer cohort, independent predictors of suicide included older age, male sex, white race, and lack of primary resection. The aforementioned predictors, plus metastatic disease, similarly predicted suicide in the rectal cancer cohort.

Conclusions

The suicide risk in crc patients is low (<0.2%), and no difference was found based on location of the primary tumour. Sex, age, race, distant spread of disease, and intact primary tumour were the main predictors of suicide among crc patients. Further studies and interventions are needed to target these high-risk groups.

KEYWORDS: Colorectal cancer, suicide, predictors, population-based studies, seer database

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is a devastating illness both physically and mentally1,2. A diagnosis of cancer has been associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation or attempts36, and suicide is one of the leading causes of non-cancer-related mortality7. In recent years, significant advances in the treatment of cancer have led to increased awareness about survivorship issues and the significant psychosocial burden experienced by cancer patients13,6.

Several studies, mostly from Europe, have demonstrated an increased incidence of suicide among cancer patients817. In one large U.S. study, Misono et al.17 demonstrated that the incidence of suicide was nearly doubled in cancer patients compared with the general population, with variation by the anatomic cancer site. Higher suicide rates were associated with male sex, white race, unmarried status, and advanced disease at the time of diagnosis17.

Colorectal cancer (crc) is the 3rd most common cancer and the 3rd leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. The lifetime risk of crc is estimated to be 1 in 2018,19. Although previous studies have demonstrated an increased risk of suicide in crc patients9,15,17, the predictors of suicide in that population have yet to be determined. In addition, despite crc being commonly discussed as a single entity, morbidity is increased for rectal cancer compared with colon cancer because of greater ostomy rates and local complications from recurrent or advanced disease in the pelvis. In rectal cancer, about 75% of patients will have a defunctioning stoma or end colostomy, which, compared with primary anastomosis, carries a higher risk of postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and increased mortality20. Consequently, the objective of our study was to examine the incidence and predictors of suicide for patients with rectal cancer and with colon cancer.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (seer) program (http://seer.cancer.gov) of the U.S. National Cancer Institute is a conglomerate of 18 cancer registries in the United States. The program collects data about cancer incidence and mortality; it is the only comprehensive source of population-based information in the United States that includes stage of cancer at the time of diagnosis and patient survival data. The demographic distribution, incidence, and survival data relating to cancer in the seer database registries is considered representative of the entire U.S. population21. To access the seer data, we signed and submitted a seer Research Data Agreement form through the seer Web site. Upon acceptance, access to the data and the SEER*Stat software was granted.

Study Population and Covariates

Using seer data from 1973–2009, we identified adult patients with a confirmed pathology diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum [International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition, codes C18.0–C18.9 (colon cancer) and C19.9–C20.9 (rectal cancer)]. The outcome of interest was a cause of death designated as Suicide and Self-inflicted Injury (code 50220). Adjustments were made for demographic and disease covariates—specifically, age at diagnosis, sex, race (white, African American, or other), marital status (single, married, or unknown status), primary tumour site (colon vs. rectum), stage at diagnosis (local or regional vs. distant), number of primary tumours, and whether surgery to the primary site was performed. Our assessed outcomes were mortality rates as well as suicide rates for the colon and rectal cancer cohorts.

Statistical Analysis

We used parametric and nonparametric statistical tests to assess cohort characteristics. We applied the chi-square test for comparisons of categorical variables according to cancer type. For continuous variables, either the Student t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used. All comparisons were two-tailed, with p < 0.05 indicating significance. To assess predictors of suicide between and within the cancer cohorts, we used Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and multivariate adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. We used the SAS software application (version 9.4: SAS Institute, Cary, NC, U.S.A.) for our analysis.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the Study Population

In the seer database, 631,364 adults with a confirmed diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma were identified, of whom 443,368 (70.2%) had colon cancer and 187,996 (29.8%) had rectal cancer.

Patients with colon cancer were slightly older than those with rectal cancer (median age: 70 years vs. 67 years, p < 0.0001). Colon cancer was equally distributed between men and women. In contrast, rectal cancer was more common in men than in women [106,408 (57%) vs. 81,588 (43%), p < 0.0001]. However, despite the observations of statistical significance, differences between the cohorts were not meaningful. For instance, most patients were married, of white race, had locoregional disease, and underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour. Table i shows further details about the baseline characteristics of the cohorts.

TABLE I Baseline characteristics of the colorectal cancer cohort

 

Median survival was modestly longer in patients with rectal cancer than in those with colon cancer (38 months vs. 35 months, p < 0.0001). At the time of the present analysis, 112,535 (60%) rectal cancer patients and 279,066 (63%) colon cancer patients had died. Suicide as the primary cause of death was documented in only 337 rectal cancer patients (0.18%) and 611 colon cancer patients (0.14%), representing 0.30% and 0.22% of all deaths respectively.

Predictors of Suicide in the CRC Cohort

The risk of suicide was highest in men [hazard ratio (hr): 7.56; 95% confidence interval (ci): 5.34 to 10.70]. Other available patient demographics that predicted a higher risk of suicide included older age (>70 years hr: 1.55; 95% ci: 1.23 to 1.94), white race (hr: 3.21; 95% ci: 1.75 to 5.88), and a marital status of single (hr: 1.56; 95% ci: 1.14 to 2.13). In contrast, associations between disease-related characteristics and the risk of suicide were inconsistent. For example, metastatic disease (M1) at diagnosis (hr: 1.58; 95% ci: 1.13 to 2.21) and lack of primary tumour resection—that is, primary tumour in situ (hr: 2.83; 95% ci: 1.97 to 4.05)—were associated with a higher risk of suicide. Conversely, no clear correlation of suicide with other features of the primary tumour such as location [rectum vs. colon (hr: 1.05; 95% ci: 0.83 to 1.33)] or presence of multiple primary tumours (hr: 1.05; 95% ci: 0.82 to 1.35) was observed. Table ii shows further details about the associations of patient and disease characteristics with the risk of suicide.

TABLE II Adjusted multivariate analysis of predictors of suicide in the colorectal cancer (CRC) cohort

 

Predictors of Suicide in the Rectal and Colon Cancer Cohorts

As in the crc cohort, male sex was highly predictive of suicide in the rectal and colon cancer cohorts alike (rectal cancer hr: 9.91; 95% ci: 4.83 to 20.36; colon cancer hr: 6.82; 95% ci: 4.58 to 10.16). Additionally, suicide was more highly associated with older age (>70 years) and white race. In contrast, marital status was not a predictor of suicide in the two sub-cohorts. Interestingly, having metastatic disease at diagnosis (M1) was associated with a higher risk of suicide in the rectal cancer cohort (hr: 1.92; 95% ci: 1.12 to 3.30), but not in the colon cancer cohort. Table ii shows further details about the predictors of suicide in the rectal and colon cancer cohorts.

DISCUSSION

An increased incidence of suicide in cancer patients compared with the general public has been demonstrated by several studies812,14,15,17. Specific tumour sites associated with the highest risk of suicide include lung22, stomach17 and oral cavity23. In prior studies, the risk of suicide was found to be higher in crc patients than in the general population (29.1 per 100,000 person–years; standardized mortality ratio: 1.9; 95% ci: 1.74 to 2.07)17; however, to our knowledge, no prior study has assessed the predictors of suicide in crc patients specifically. As was found for other tumour sites13,17,22,23, we confirm the associations of several patient-related risk factors (such as male sex, white race, and advanced age) with suicide in crc patients. Those characteristics are similarly predictive of suicide in the general population24.

Advanced stage at time of diagnosis was also associated with the risk of suicide in crc patients in our study. That observation is likely multifactorial and not merely a reflection of the poor prognosis associated with advanced stage, which has previously been shown to increase the likelihood of suicide10,15,17,25. The desire for hastened death in advanced and terminally ill cancer patients correlates with physical symptoms, quality of life, and the perception of being a burden to others6. In addition, an increase in morbidity, declining performance status, and the need for ongoing treatment (all commonly seen in advanced cancer patients) increase the risk for comorbid depression1 and apply significant stress, both perceived and actual, on caregivers2629. Patients could view suicide as a strategy to relieve stress on the family.

Another significant predictor of suicide in our study was a lack of surgical resection of the primary tumour in both the colon and the rectal cohorts. An intact primary site might lead to more local symptoms such as pain, further contributing to the psychological burden of the disease. Retrospective studies have suggested a possible improvement in mortality if the primary tumour is resected in the setting of advanced disease30,31, and prospective studies are underway to evaluate the effect of resection on overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life32. Whether performing resections in patients with advanced crc will translate into a decreased risk of suicide has yet to be determined.

We hypothesized that because of the differences in recurrence patterns and therapies (and therapy side effects) in rectal and colon cancer, differences in suicide rates might be evident. Rectal cancer is associated with significant morbidity related to the increased rates of stoma and to the devastating consequences of locally advanced and recurrent disease, such as significant pain and spinal cord compression. On univariate analysis, a rectal-site cancer was a predictor of suicide; however, when controlling for other important covariates, a multivariate analysis failed to identify the site of the primary tumour as a predictor of suicide. A potential explanation for that finding could be related to the timing of suicide. The risk of suicide is felt to be strongest very early after diagnosis1416,33. Fang et al.15 found that the highest risk fell within the first 12 weeks after diagnosis (relative risk: 4.7) and that the risk lessened after that time (relative risk at 12–52 weeks: 2.1; relative risk at 52 weeks and beyond: 1.6). Those observations suggest that suicide in cancer patients is possibly more related to the initial psychological burden of diagnosis than to the accumulating morbidity from the disease or the side effects of treatment.

Despite a declining risk of suicide over time, the risk level remains elevated even decades after diagnosis, suggesting a long-lasting effect on quality of life for survivors1,34. Although our study showed stronger associations of suicide with non-modifiable factors (sex, age, race, and marital status), special attention to this high-risk patient population and, possibly, interventions to support their psychological well-being might help to reduce the risk of suicide. Such attention is particularly important for cancers with a potentially higher cure rate, such as crc.

Inherent to its design, our study has limitations. Potential confounders such as coexisting medical and psychiatric conditions and substance abuse could not be evaluated because that information is not collected by the seer program. In addition, details of therapeutic interventions for cancer are not adequately captured in the seer database and could have affected the results. Finally, misclassifications of the cause of death (specifically, suicide) could have led to an underrepresentation of that outcome in our analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of suicide in crc patients did not vary based on the location of the primary tumour, but our study did identify a number of risk factors for suicide in both colon and rectal cancer patients. The information presented here might help to identify patients at higher risk of suicide, for whom screening and early interventions might improve psychological well-being.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare that we have none.

AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS

*Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB;,
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB,
BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC;,
§Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON..

REFERENCES

1. Massie MJ. Prevalence of depression in patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004;:57–71.
cross-ref  pubmed  

2. Krebber AM, Buffart LM, Kleijn G, et al. Prevalence of depression in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of diagnostic interviews and self-report instruments. Psychooncology 2014;23:121–30.
cross-ref  

3. Walker J, Waters RA, Murray G, et al. Better off dead: suicidal thoughts in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4725–30.
cross-ref  pubmed  

4. Allebeck P, Bolund C. Suicides and suicide attempts in cancer patients. Psychol Med 1991;21:979–84.
cross-ref  pubmed  

5. Mystakidou K, Parpa E, Katsouda E, Galanos A, Vlahos L. The role of physical and psychological symptoms in desire for death: a study of terminally ill cancer patients. Psychooncology 2006;15:355–60.
cross-ref  

6. Breitbart W, Rosenfeld B, Pessin H, et al. Depression, hopelessness, and desire for hastened death in terminally ill patients with cancer. JAMA 2000;284:2907–11.
cross-ref  

7. Riihimäki M, Thomsen H, Brandt A, Sundquist J, Hemminki K. Death causes in breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2012;23:604–10.
cross-ref  

8. Anguiano L, Mayer DK, Piven ML, Rosenstein D. A literature review of suicide in cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 2012;35:E14–26.
cross-ref  

9. Robson A, Scrutton F, Wilkinson L, MacLeod F. The risk of suicide in cancer patients: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 2010;19:1250–8.
cross-ref  pubmed  

10. Dormer NR, McCaul KA, Kristjanson LJ. Risk of suicide in cancer patients in Western Australia, 1981–2002. Med J Aust 2008;188:140–3.
pubmed  

11. Nasseri K, Mills PK, Mirshahidi HR, Moulton LH. Suicide in cancer patients in California, 1997–2006. Arch Suicide Res 2012;16:324–33.
cross-ref  

12. Robinson D, Renshaw C, Okello C, Møller H, Davies EA. Suicide in cancer patients in South East England from 1996 to 2005: a population-based study. Br J Cancer 2009;101:198–201.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

13. Henderson JM, Ord RA. Suicide in head and neck cancer patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1217–21.
cross-ref  pubmed  

14. Hem E, Loge JH, Haldorsen T, Ekeberg Ø. Suicide risk in cancer patients from 1960 to 1999. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4209–16.
cross-ref  pubmed  

15. Fang F, Fall K, Mittleman MA, et al. Suicide and cardiovascular death after a cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1310–18.
cross-ref  pubmed  

16. Fang F, Keating NL, Mucci LA, et al. Immediate risk of suicide and cardiovascular death after a prostate cancer diagnosis: cohort study in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:307–14.
cross-ref  pubmed  

17. Misono S, Weiss NS, Fann JR, Redman M, Yueh B. Incidence of suicide in persons with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4731–8.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

18. American Cancer Society (acs). Colorectal Cancer Facts and Figures 2011–2013. Atlanta, GA: acs; 2011. [Available online at: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/colorectal-cancer-facts-and-figures/colorectal-cancer-facts-and-figures-2011-2013.pdf; cited 26 October 2017]

19. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:11–30.
cross-ref  pubmed  

20. Bakker IS, Snijders HS, Wouters MW, et al. High complication rate after low anterior resection for mid and high rectal cancer; results of a population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:692–8.
cross-ref  pubmed  

21. Hankey BF, Ries LA, Edwards BK. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:1117–21.
pubmed  

22. Urban D, Rao A, Bressel M, Neiger D, Solomon B, Mileshkin L. Suicide in lung cancer: who is at risk? Chest 2013;144:1245–52.
cross-ref  pubmed  

23. Yu GP, Mehta V, Branovan D, Huang Q, Schantz SP. Non-cancer-related deaths from suicide, cardiovascular disease, and pneumonia in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;138:25–32.
cross-ref  pubmed  

24. Spicer RS, Miller TR. Suicide acts in 8 states: incidence and case fatality rates by demographics and method. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1885–91.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

25. Ahn MH, Park S, Lee HB, et al. Suicide in cancer patients within the first year of diagnosis. Psychooncology 2015;24:601–7.
cross-ref  

26. Libert Y, Borghgraef C, Beguin Y, et al. Factors associated with self-perceived burden to the primary caregiver in older patients with hematologic malignancies: an exploratory study. Psychooncology 2017;26:118–24.
cross-ref  

27. Soleimani MA, Lehto RH, Negarandeh R, Bahrami N, Chan YH. Death anxiety and quality of life in Iranian caregivers of patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 2017;40:E1–10.
cross-ref  

28. Gropper S, van der Meer E, Landes T, Bucher H, Stickel A, Goerling U. Assessing cancer-related distress in cancer patients and caregivers receiving outpatient psycho-oncological counseling. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:2351–7.
cross-ref  

29. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Montie JE, et al. Living with prostate cancer: patients’ and spouses’ psychosocial status and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:4171–7.
cross-ref  pubmed  

30. Clancy C, Burke JP, Barry M, Kalady MF, Calvin Coffey J. A meta-analysis to determine the effect of primary tumor resection for stage iv colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases on patient survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:3900–8.
cross-ref  pubmed  

31. Ahmed S, Leis A, Fields A, et al. Survival impact of surgical resection of primary tumor in patients with stage iv colorectal cancer: results from a large population-based cohort study. Cancer 2014;120:683–91.
cross-ref  

32. Cotte E, Villeneuve L, Passot G, et al. on behalf of the French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (greccar). greccar 8: impact on survival of the primary tumor resection in rectal cancer with unresectable synchronous metastasis: a randomized multicentre study. BMC Cancer 2015;15:47.
cross-ref  

33. Crocetti E, Arniani S, Acciai S, Barchielli A, Buiatti E. High suicide mortality soon after diagnosis among cancer patients in central Italy. Br J Cancer 1998;77:1194–6.
cross-ref  pubmed  pmc  

34. Schairer C, Brown LM, Chen BE, et al. Suicide after breast cancer: an international population-based study of 723,810 women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1416–19.
cross-ref  pubmed  


Correspondence to: Haider H. Samawi—current address: Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 Street NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2; former address: BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, 600 West 10th Avenue, 4th Floor, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6. E-mail: haider.samawi@ahs.ca

(Return to Top)



Current Oncology, VOLUME 24, NUMBER 6, December 2017








Copyright © 2017 Multimed Inc.
ISSN: 1198-0052 (Print) ISSN: 1718-7729 (Online)